Free book from Bookshout so can not complain. It is for an older version of Office 365 (Lync has been replaced with Skype for Business). It talks more of what you need to do to plan for a good Office 365 Collaboration with Sitepoint more than it does how to use the apps. That is a good idea because most of us know how to use the apps. It also focuses on the administrator side of things. It is free, pick it up from Bookshout if you have a need for it.
I was given an advanced copy of this book as part of a 'Launch Team'. I was asked to give an honest review.
This is an excellent book for a men's ministry. There is inside each man an inventor wanting to do something great. How do we know what it is that we are to do. We need to train ourselves to listen to the God who created us in the first place. Only through him can we learn what it is that we were invented for so that we can learn what we need to invent. It may not be a physical invention, it may be a need that you meet for others, and in fact it will often be.
The book has 8 chapters to it. The first one is an autobiographical look of the author. What he went through to be a success in his chosen field, and how he still felt that he needed to turn to the one who invented him to find true success. Chapters 2 through 8 look at one inventor, what they had to go through, to overcome, to make it through to create the invention that they had been successful with.
From Edison and seeing that he was not self made, to Bell, who wanted to help his deaf mother hear, Marconi, who had to figure out a way for the noise of the telegraph signals to be overcome, the Wright brothers having to overcome the feeling of not being able to accomplish something, and others. Each chapter brings us their story and how the author feels that we can use this in our lives. And then, we are guided in looking at each story with questions to make us think about why and how these are to influence our lives. The questions are designed to lead us deeper and understand things.
There are also some appendices that some of the chapters refer to. These take us deeper into what we are supposed to see in ourselves, what God is calling us to do and to get us launched out into doing it. These exercises are important.
As noted, the book could be used for men's group but also could be used in it's own as one man trying to find out his call in life.
This is something I had never heard of before. It is a cozy mystery. Short stories with no adult content. It was kind of nice to have that but that does not leave out the fact that to have a good mystery you have to have a good story.
In the end it was any of a list of people who could have done it including the storyteller herself. We know it was not her because she is telling us what she did.
Someone once said that if you kill someone in the third act with a sword, you better have made it available in the first act. And that was my problem here. There was nothing that pointed to the killer as well as no red herrings to throw us off on the other people.
As a quick mystery to kill some time it was OK.
Standard disclaimer. I got an advanced copy of the book from NetGalley and Intervarsity Press in exchange for an honest review.
Some books you can skim and get something out of them. Some books take a lot of time to read because you want to take your time and soak it all in. This is one of those times. Reading pre release copies can be frustrating sometimes. After a certain time period the books can no longer be read. This is one of those books I may have to spend some money on.
The premise is that most leaders in Christianity (yes it is geared towards Christian Leaders), tend to make plans and then ask God to come into them. Mr. Falding changes that idea. Why not ask God what He wants do and then make the plans. How much of leadership in organizations is done with asking God first. When we do this it tends to slow things down first.
One of the first thing this type of leader does is to fill himself with the fountain that comes from God. You can not spill onto others what you do not have in yourself. That is chapter 1, and the other 9 chapters do not disappoint. They include topics of looking at out thoughts (one that helped me a lot), taking time to pray (not as an afterthought for the start of a meeting but before it all starts), and leading with the same grace that God gives to us.
Each chapter has a set of exercises to be done as you finish the chapter. Do not skip these. These take what you have learned and make it something solid in your life. You learn some by seeing, some by writing and a lot by doing. Not doing these exercises leaves out the chance to make these internal in your life. I only did a few of them because of time constraints in my life but I have used them in helping others find something inside themselves to help change themselves.
I cannot recommend this book any higher than 5 starts or I would. If you are even in lower levels of volunteer work in a church, you can learn so much from this book.
John Piper, the author, is a well respect preacher and theologian. I am not a big follower of his but do visit his web site and pick up on some offers he has. For the Easter season he put together this small book with 8 devotions for holy week. The whole book could most likely be read in an hour. But the trick here is to read a chapter each day, preferably early, and meditate on what it says. When used in that way, this book is great. And you really do not need to limit it to Holy Week. While it fits there, it is good for anyone who wants to mediate on what Jesus has done for us. It is available for free at http://www.desiringgod.org/books/love... should you care to pick up the PDF or a physical copy can be purchased there as well.
Standard disclaimer, Netgalley and Multnomah provided a copy of this book in exchange for an honest review. Interesting read. It is the Sunday after Jesus has died, He is missing. Two discouraged travelers go back to their home town of Emmaus, about a seven mile walk away from Jerusalem. They are joined by a third unknown, who explains to them all that had to happen to Jesus was in the scriptures. When they urge him to stay and eat, in the breaking of the bread, Jesus reveals Himself. Then he is gone.
Flashback, we are on the hill watching Jesus die. During his time on the cross he utters 7 phrases (Furtick calls them words). Seven happens to be the distance to Emmaus. So for each mile of the journey, we look at the phrases in the order that he said them. They weave the steps that a Christian should take for salvation forward.
Each 'mile' is given a quick story of what was happening at the time said. Then there is a separate section for what Furtick thinks those phrases are to mean. Like anyone else I may not agree with someone's theology but I can learn a lot from anyone I take the time to listen to (or read from).
I enjoyed most of the book. I am not sure if it was me or the book but near the middle I had a hard time with the book. It felt like to some degree or another it was repeating itself in some way. It may have been me being familiar with the content, I do not know. But it was a point that I had to keep pressing on to finish. Eventually I did and the ending chapters did feel much better.
The book would be good as a series of devotions for the week leading up to Easter (Holy Week) or it can be read at any time. I would recommend this book for someone who wants a better understanding of what Jesus did on the cross for us.
Standard disclaimer: Netgalley.com/Dynamite Entertainment provided an advanced copy for an honest review.
I enjoyed the story. I was back in the 70's with a show that I enjoyed so much. The author was well versed in the story lines from the show and used them to advance the plot of the book and weave them in and out. It was done in such a way that the person that had never seen the show could understand. The characters were true to there counterparts on the show. It was even a cute touch that they used the swear words that were written so they could swear but since they were made up words they got by the censors. The artwork for the most part was quite good. It helped to move the story along. My only gripe was with the main characters. For the people not part of the main cast of the show, they were drawn fairly clear. Main cast however seemed to be drawn with features that seemed to be like they had their faces blurred after they were drawn. My guess here is that they could not get permission to use the distinct features of the actors so they muffled the features a little bit. It did take away some of the enjoyment of the graphic novel. I am hearing Lorne Greene, Richard Hatch, and Dirk Benedict in my head because I know them so well, but the pictures just does not go along with the voice, especially Mr. Green. It was a nice trip back in time to when life was a lot different.
Disclaimer, given copy of book in advance for an honest review by the Netgalley web site. It was an interesting book. I know that what I believe is true but when I took a philosophy class last semester (as I get older I want to keep the mind going), I realized that I could not talk intelligently about it. Many of the arguments that were given me to question my faith in that class were used in the book (like the typical 'Flying Spaghetti Monster' one). I am not sure that I could ever make it to the Christian Case Maker that he talks about in this book. At this point I can talk a little more intelligently about the questions that could come at me. The book follows a natural progression from barely understanding the topic to being well versed in and what to do. He seems to rely a lot on the fact that you have read the other books in his series but when he mentions them, he does bring forth the relevant points from them so you do not miss anything in the referrals to them. I would recommend to any who are being questioned about their faith and as a tool for a parent to sit with their pre-teen and teenage children so that when they go off to college, their faith will be there own, not the faith of their parents. They will be able to talk intelligently about why they believe what they believe when they are questioned in class.
I always wondered why the church that I had been attending for years started doing the things they did the way they did. Thanks to this book I know why. They had read this book or one like it. I do not disagree with the author on the premise of a church as a family, nor do I disagree with his thoughts that all generations should be at the table together. What I do disagree with is the concept that this can be done in a church that has been around for a while. When it did happen, people started to vote with their feet how they felt about the church. I weathered it out for a while but as I saw needed ministries be gutted because they could no longer be supported, and the one that I was involved with was one of them, I left as well. This book is better to be read by a person who is involved with a new church rather than trying to change an existing one. There was a lot of good material in it. I just feel that trying to steer a big ship is not as easy as steering a row boat. Most people will not last long enough in bigger churches to get the ship on the course that it needs to be.
While not a current book (2013 is what I teach, 2016 is most current) it offers a good overview of security features that do not change a whole bunch in each version of Office. If you can pick it up relatively low cost it would be a good investment.
Excellent book for the season of Lent. Ms. Gooder focuses on the three things that are important that come from Easter. 1) The resurrection being the most important to a Christian. Without it there is not salvation. The next is the ascension, without this Jesus would still be here and we would expect Him to be doing all the work. 2) The ascension, since it falls on a Thursday, is usually not remembered on most church calendars. However, it is important. 3) Pentecost. Without this event, we would not have the power to go forth and tell others. Without each of these events, the story of Easter is incomplete. I was able to read this as part of Faithlife web site and their free book. As part of the site, people could sign up to read the book together and talk about it. That made the book a little more interesting to me as I read what other people thought and could reflect on things that I missed. It is a seasonable book. For that reason, though it could be read any time of the year, it is best read as a reflection time leading up to Easter, or as part of the time from Easter to Pentecost. Enjoyed the book.
Standard disclaimer. I got an advanced copy of the book from NetGalley in exchange for an honest review. Deron Spoo has written an excellent book that can be used in so many different ways. It can be used as a personal devotional, a Christian Education class, a Bible study, etc. My only disappointment, minor because I may have read something into his introduction. I was under the impression that he had created this book of stories to help an unchurched (ignostic he calls them) to understand the Christian faith better. In reality the title says it all, 'the Bible's biggest ideas. The book is written to all levels. A person who has read the Bible and studied it can gain some new insight. I know that I looked at some scriptures in a way that I would not have before. On the other hand, a person who is unchurched can pick up the book can gain an understanding of what it truly means to be a Christian and what we believe. Forty ideas are presented. 20 from the Older Testament (Old means we do not use it any more, older means it still has value), and 20 from the New Testament. One might have their own scriptures that they might include, but I feel that Mr. Spoo has chosen with care what he thought were the best ones. I am sure it was hard to narrow it down to 40 ideas. If you are looking for a book that argues theology, this is not it. Nor does it deal with the issues that as Christians separate us into denominations. It does, however, introduce the key concepts of Christianity in nice bite sized pieces. High recommendations from me on this book.
To start with got a free copy of the book from NetGalley in exchange for a review
When I first started reading this it took a little bit of getting into it. I had just finished reading 'The Church of Facebook' and was expecting it to be very similar. It really was not, but like that book, it took some getting into it for me, but for opposite reasons. Church of Facebook seems to tell stories that had nothing to do with the subject but in the end had everything to do with it. Fachooked started out with stories but went right into the why of them.
It was interesting in that the author started with the light fare and when you got far enough in, the subjects became a little darker. And that is the way it should be. If she had started with the scary stuff first people might not read it at all. That was a good call on her part. If that is not what she had planned it still was a good move on her part. I feel that just the right amount of time was spent on each subject, although for me and what I know (I work in IT and am familiar with a lot of this) some seemed to drag on. I can not object to that because not everyone has the same level of knowledge and what drags for me might be not enough for you.
In all, I think it was a good read and would recommend it to anyone that has interest in the subject matter.
I got an advanced copy from Netgallery in exchange for a review. Unfortunately I could not finish in time for the book to be released. This is a good thing. It was so deep, rather than skim through it I had to deep read it each chapter. The book has the feel of a Classroom textbook. It is easy to read but the topics are very deep. There is a clear pattern to each chapter and once that pattern is noticed it does make the reading a little easier. It is clear that once you get into it, this is a Christian world view book. The name does not give the hint that it would be. I wish I had a copy of it last semester when taking a Philosophy class, a lot of the questions that came up I had a hard time addressing. It would have been good to have this a reference to quote from. It is the third in a series and I would love to some time invest in the other two. For now, I will have to add them to my want to read list. Summing it up, it is a great book, but it may not be for everyone.
I got a free ecopy of this book from Net Gallery in exchange for an honest review of the book.
I ask to review this book not because I have a child who is gay, but I have children who have gay friends. In fact last Thanksgiving she my daughter brought home a young man from hr college who says he is trans-gendered. He was welcome into our home with no problem whatsoever. A far cry from the father who told him not to come home for Thanksgiving.
I was hoping that I could understand the right and wrong things to say. The author does address that, but the politics in it is fairly overwhelming. For about the first quarter of the book she spouts the belief that God made your child that way. If you do not think that God did this then you are basically told how unloving you are. While she does not use the words, she basically is talking about the gay gene theory. It has not been proven either way, but she speaks as if it is the only truth. For a person who preaches that we should not judge, she judges you flat out if you disagree with her.
As a Christian, I also do not care for her bashing the church as a whole. She basically says that there is no church that will affirm your gay child. She late in the book talks about a select few that would be accepting and recommends a web site that you should go to. One of her problems here is she talks about people who have religion and not relationship. The church I go to (one of the megachurches she puts down with not names mentioned) when I told the pastor of the church that my daughter would be bringing a trans-gendered person to church said, great, we will love them like we love everyone else. You see, we preach a love for all in our church. A sin is a sin, and there sin is no worse than mine or yours. What matters is your relationship with God.
I can not recommend this book at all as long as the political baggage is attached to it. If she could have stuck to the ins and outs of loving a child who was gay I would have given it 5 stars. Since she got political about things I could only give it three. I also recommend that the author not judge others, just like she talks about in the book.
Used to be this was where I posted a lot of the flotsam and jetsam that flowed through my mind. As I became more involved in Facebook, that is where a lot of my thoughts wound up going and I realized the other day that I had not blogged for a while.
Logging in tonight I realized it has been a year an a half. And before that it was spotty.
So, here I am again. let's see if I can be a little bit more regular here.
We changed churches recently. While I still love the people at Grace Church in Tulsa, I did not feel like I was part of the fellowship anymore. I honestly felt that it was time to move. I looked at a few, but I kind of felt that I should be at Lifechurch.TV South Tulsa campus. Last week Pastor Craig started a sermon series on "The Christian Atheist". Very good series. I was encouraged to try a reading plan that they had called
I have read the story of the prodigal son for years, even facilitated a group that discussed the The Father Heart of God: Experiencing the Depths of His Love for You , a book devoted to that same story. So for me, I did not think that I could learn anything new from it. You know, God has a habit of grabbing you by the neck sometime and just politely tell you, shut up and listen. I did for this one.
It is an old story, I am sure that you know it well if you grow up in church. One son wants his inheritance while dad is still living. Takes the money and spends it all, then, when he has nothing less, he tries to return home to be a servant. Dad rushes to him, forgives him, kills the fatted calf and has a party for him. The older son gets mad because he did not get a party the whole time he stayed. The question that this devotional tried to bring out was, "which son was the better one?" (that is my version of it).
I always though that the older son was the better one. He stayed with the father through all the problems of life that were thrown at them, there he was, right by the dad's side. If the younger had not run away, then he would have been blessed just like the older one did. Sure, the younger son was forgiven, that says something, but the older one was smarter. Or was he? His actions, that I had not really looked at closer before, showed he was just as bad as his younger brother.
In reality, one brother is living by faith, the other living by works. Both are elements that God wants in our lives, and like the father loved both of his sons, God loves both sides equally. Both of these, however, are ditches on the side of the road. You get off on one you or the other, you are out of the will of God. God will gently prod you to get out of the ditch and get back up to center ground so that you can move on with what He has planned for your life.
Take some time to do the reading plan, I am sure you will get something else out of it. If nothing else take some time to take a look at the YouTube presentation of the story.
Helping my son with homework tonight and the question was name the three largest cities in Oklahoma by population and land mass. We looked up population and it was Oklahoma City, Tulsa and Norman. By land mass it is Oklahoma City, Norman and Tulsa. He wants one answer not two so I look up population per square mile. That muddles things up even more as it is Tulsa, Oklahoma City and Norman.
So if you ever need the answer to the largest city in Oklahoma, you can give one of three answers and be right!
So they are trying to blame something on us from un-named sources. What is funny is the following quote:
Since Flame was an intelligence "collection" virus rather than a cyberwarfare program to sabotage computer systems, it required less-stringent U.S. legal and policy review than any U.S. involvement in offensive cyberwarfare efforts, experts told Reuters.
The CIA, NSA, Pentagon, and Office of the Director of National Intelligence declined to comment.
Um, yes, the USA and the various departments are just going to admit to something like this? If they were not involved and said so, would the average person believe them.
Problems with conspiracies, is once they start, they are hard to kill....
So, in Georgia, there is a little girl throwing a tantrum in school and the police get called in:
Salecia Johnson, 6, was accused of tearing items off the walls and throwing books and toys in an outburst Friday at Creekside Elementary School in Milledgeville, according to a police report.
Police said a small shelf thrown by the child struck the principal in the leg during the fracas. The child also jumped on a paper shredder and tried to break a glass frame, the police report states.
So, she was really traumatizing all the students all around her, would you agree? So what do the cops do?
The school called police. When an officer tried to calm the child in the principal's office, she resisted, police say. She "was restrained by placing her hands behind her back and handcuffed," a police report states.
Why did they call the cops and not the parents is a good question. In one version of the story that I read, the parents were unavailable for contact. If you contact everyone on the list in most schools, the next step in most cases in the police. So far I think the police or the school did not wrong what so ever, though the cuffs might have been overkill, I understand that it was for her safety in the police car.
But here is the kicker:
The girl's aunt, Candace Ruff, went with the child's mother to pick her up from the police station. She said Salecia had been in a holding cell and complained about the handcuffs.
"She said they were really tight. She said they really hurt her wrists," Ruff said. "She was so shaken up when we went there to pick her up."
And:
"We would not like to see this happen to another child, because it's horrifying. It's devastating," her aunt told The Associated Press.
So let me translate what she said in what it means to me. It was totally OK for her niece to terrorize the school, give her classmates nightmares about her actions, and be totally impossible to work with. What is not OK is for her niece is to have handcuffs put on her because they hurt her wrist and she was so shaken up about it, to the point of being devastated.
Am I missing something here. She got her 15 minutes of fame I guess. I do not think I would have been calling the police if my child had been acting like that...